Shaykhism

Shaykhism, also known as Shaykhism or Shaikhism, is a religious and philosophical movement that emerged in the late 18th century in the Punjab region of South Asia. It was founded by Sheikh Ahmad al-Sirhindi, also known as Sheikh Ahmad Sirhindi or Mujaddid Alf Thani (1564–1624), who is regarded as the “Mujaddid” or “Renewer” of Islam for the second millennium of the Islamic calendar.

Key features and characteristics of Shaykhism include:

  1. Spiritual Renewal and Revival: Sheikh Ahmad al-Sirhindi sought to revive and reform Islamic spirituality in response to what he perceived as a decline in the practice of Islam during his time. He emphasized the importance of spiritual experiences and direct mystical connections with God.
  2. Tawhid and Sufism: Shaykhism upholds the central Islamic principle of Tawhid, which is the belief in the oneness of God. It also incorporates elements of Sufi mysticism, emphasizing the importance of spiritual introspection and closeness to God.
  3. Unity of Being (Wahdat al-Wujud): One of the central tenets of Shaykhism is the concept of “Wahdat al-Wujud,” which means the unity of being. According to this idea, all of creation is a manifestation of the Divine, and the material world is a reflection of God’s attributes.
  4. Controversy and Criticism: Shaykhism faced criticism from orthodox Islamic scholars due to its emphasis on mysticism and the concept of Wahdat al-Wujud. Some critics accused Sheikh Ahmad al-Sirhindi of promoting pantheism or beliefs that they considered heretical.
  5. Continuation and Expansion: After the passing of Sheikh Ahmad al-Sirhindi, his teachings were carried on by his successors and disciples. Shaykhism continued to spread and gain followers, particularly among Sufi communities in South Asia.
  6. Bahá’í Connection: Shaykhism is historically significant as it played a role in the early development of the Bahá’í Faith. One of the prominent early Bahá’í figures, Mírzá Husayn-‘Alí Núrí (Bahá’u’lláh), was influenced by Shaykhism before he founded the Bahá’í Faith in the 19th century.

It’s essential to distinguish Shaykhism from mainstream Islamic theology, as some of its concepts and practices are unique to the movement. While Shaykhism is relatively small compared to major Islamic sects, its impact on certain mystical and philosophical aspects of Islamic thought has been noteworthy, especially in the context of South Asian religious history.

Shuddhadvaita

Shuddhadvaita, also known as Pure Monism or Pure Non-dualism, is a philosophical and theological school of thought within Hinduism. It was founded by the philosopher and theologian Vallabha Acharya (1479–1531 CE) and is one of the major schools of Vaishnavism, a tradition that worships Lord Vishnu as the Supreme Being.

Key features and characteristics of Shuddhadvaita include:

  1. Monism and Non-dualism: Shuddhadvaita asserts the principle of non-dualism, which means that there is only one ultimate reality, and all existence is a manifestation of that one reality. According to this philosophy, the entire universe, including individual souls (atmas) and the material world (prakriti), is non-separate from the Supreme Being, Brahman.
  2. Brahma-Vidya: Shuddhadvaita places significant emphasis on the concept of Brahma-Vidya, the knowledge or realization of Brahman. Vallabha Acharya taught that through devotion, knowledge, and surrender to the Supreme Being, individuals can attain the direct experience of their non-difference from Brahman.
  3. Suddha Sattva: In Shuddhadvaita, the material world is regarded as Suddha Sattva, which means pure existence or the pure essence of Brahman. Unlike some other schools of thought that consider the material world as an illusion (maya), Shuddhadvaita considers it as a real manifestation of the Supreme Reality.
  4. Grace of God: Vallabha Acharya emphasized the role of divine grace (prasad) in the liberation of souls. He believed that it is through the grace of Lord Krishna (a form of Lord Vishnu) that devotees can attain liberation and realize their identity with Brahman.
  5. Path of Loving Devotion (Bhakti): Shuddhadvaita emphasizes the path of loving devotion (bhakti) as the most effective means to attain spiritual liberation. Devotees are encouraged to cultivate a deep, loving relationship with Lord Krishna and surrender their individual will to the divine will.
  6. Dvaita-Advaita Synthesis: Shuddhadvaita represents a synthesis of elements from both dualistic (dvaita) and non-dualistic (advaita) philosophies. It affirms the individuality of the soul and its eternal relationship with the Supreme Being, while also asserting their essential non-difference.

Shuddhadvaita has a considerable following, particularly in the Indian states of Gujarat, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh, where the Vallabha Sampradaya, a devotional tradition, is prominent. The philosophy’s emphasis on divine grace, devotion, and the path of loving surrender to God has inspired devotees and seekers for centuries. It continues to be an essential part of Vaishnavite philosophical thought within Hinduism.

Secularism

Secularism is a political and philosophical concept that advocates for the separation of religion and government. It promotes the idea that religious institutions and beliefs should not interfere with or dictate governmental policies and decisions. Secularism aims to create a society where people of all religious and non-religious beliefs can coexist peacefully, and where the state remains neutral regarding religious matters.

Key features and characteristics of secularism include:

  1. Separation of Church and State: Secularism calls for a clear separation between religious institutions and governmental authorities. It ensures that religious organizations do not hold political power and that the state does not favor any particular religion over others.
  2. Freedom of Religion: Secularism upholds the principle of freedom of religion, allowing individuals to practice their beliefs or choose not to follow any religion without coercion or discrimination from the state or society.
  3. Equality and Non-Discrimination: Secularism seeks to ensure equal treatment and rights for all citizens, regardless of their religious or non-religious affiliations. It aims to prevent discrimination based on religious beliefs.
  4. Public Policy Based on Reason and Evidence: Secularism encourages the use of reason, evidence, and rationality in shaping public policies, rather than basing decisions on religious dogma or beliefs.
  5. Public Space Neutrality: Secularism advocates for public spaces, institutions, and schools to remain neutral and refrain from promoting or endorsing any particular religious beliefs.
  6. Religious Pluralism: Secular societies often have diverse religious and non-religious communities. Secularism respects this diversity and ensures that no single belief system dominates public life.
  7. Freedom from Religious Coercion: Secularism protects individuals from religious coercion and ensures that no one is compelled to follow a specific religion or religious practices against their will.

It is important to note that secularism does not seek to eliminate religion or undermine religious freedom. Instead, it seeks to create a society where individuals can practice their beliefs freely while maintaining a clear distinction between religious matters and governmental affairs.

Secularism is an essential principle in many democratic countries, ensuring that religious beliefs do not interfere with the functioning of the state or the rights of citizens. Different countries may adopt secularism to varying degrees, depending on their historical, cultural, and legal contexts.

Scottish common sense realism

Scottish Common Sense Realism was a philosophical school of thought that emerged in Scotland during the 18th and early 19th centuries. It was a significant intellectual movement that aimed to provide a rational foundation for knowledge and to counter skepticism and philosophical idealism prevalent at the time.

Key features and characteristics of Scottish Common Sense Realism include:

  1. Empirical Realism: Scottish Common Sense Realists believed in the existence of an external world that can be known through the senses. They emphasized the importance of empirical evidence and observation as the basis for acquiring knowledge about the world.
  2. Common Sense: The term “common sense” in this context refers to the innate and universal faculties of the human mind that allow individuals to perceive and understand reality. Scottish Common Sense Realists argued that certain truths are self-evident and universally accepted by human beings.
  3. Direct Realism: The school upheld the position of direct or naive realism, which asserts that the objects of perception exist independently of the mind and are directly perceived as they are.
  4. Rejection of Skepticism: Scottish Common Sense Realism sought to refute philosophical skepticism, which questions the possibility of certain knowledge. They believed that common sense and direct experience provided a solid foundation for knowledge and justified beliefs.
  5. Influence of Thomas Reid: Thomas Reid, a Scottish philosopher, was one of the key figures of the Scottish Common Sense Realist movement. His major works, such as “An Inquiry into the Human Mind on the Principles of Common Sense” and “Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man,” outlined and defended the principles of this school.
  6. Impact on American Philosophical Thought: Scottish Common Sense Realism had a significant influence on American intellectual and philosophical thought during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Many early American thinkers, including John Witherspoon, James Madison, and John Adams, were influenced by the ideas of Thomas Reid and Scottish Common Sense Realism.

Scottish Common Sense Realism gradually declined in popularity in the 19th century with the rise of other philosophical movements, such as German idealism and British empiricism. Nonetheless, its ideas on the reliability of common sense, direct perception, and empirical evidence have had a lasting impact on the history of philosophy and continue to be subjects of interest and debate in contemporary philosophical discussions.

Scotism

Scotism, also known as Scotist philosophy, is a philosophical and theological school of thought that emerged in the late Middle Ages, particularly in the 13th and 14th centuries. It is named after its founder, John Duns Scotus (c. 1266-1308), a Scottish Franciscan friar and philosopher.

Scotism developed as a response to the thought of other prominent medieval philosophers, such as Thomas Aquinas (Thomism) and Henry of Ghent. While Scotism shares some common ground with Thomism, it also presents its own distinct positions on various philosophical and theological issues.

Key features and characteristics of Scotism include:

  1. Primacy of the Will: Scotus emphasized the primacy of the will over the intellect. He argued that the will is the ultimate root of human actions and decisions, and that the intellect is subordinated to the will.
  2. Voluntarism: Scotus is often associated with voluntarism, a philosophical perspective that emphasizes the role of the will in determining moral and ethical choices.
  3. Univocity of Being: Scotism developed a unique theory of univocity of being, which posits that the term “being” can be applied univocally to God and creatures. This contrasts with Aquinas’s doctrine of analogy, where “being” has different meanings when applied to God and creatures.
  4. Immaculate Conception: Scotus is best known for his defense of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary. He argued that Mary was preserved from original sin from the moment of her conception, which became a significant doctrinal position in the Roman Catholic Church.
  5. Subtle Doctor: John Duns Scotus earned the title “Subtle Doctor” due to the complexity and intricacy of his philosophical arguments. He was renowned for his logical acumen and sophisticated reasoning.
  6. Influence on Later Thought: Scotism had a lasting impact on later philosophical and theological developments, particularly within the Franciscan order. It also influenced the broader landscape of medieval scholasticism.

Scotism, like Thomism, was part of the broader scholastic tradition that sought to reconcile faith and reason, engage with classical philosophy, and explore complex theological and philosophical questions. The disputes and debates between the Scotists and Thomists contributed to the rich intellectual milieu of the late Middle Ages. Today, Scotism remains an essential part of the history of Western philosophy and theology.

School of the Sextii

The School of the Sextii was an ancient Roman school of thought that was associated with the Sextii family, a prominent and influential family in the Roman Republic. Not much is known about the specific teachings or doctrines of this school, as it is not extensively documented in historical sources.

What little information we have about the School of the Sextii comes from the works of later Roman writers, such as Cicero and Seneca. According to these sources, the Sextii were known for their focus on moral philosophy and ethical principles. They advocated for a virtuous and disciplined way of life and emphasized the importance of self-control and moderation.

The Sextii family included prominent Stoic philosophers, and it is believed that their philosophical ideas and teachings were influenced by Stoicism, which was a popular philosophical school in ancient Rome. Stoicism emphasized living in harmony with nature, cultivating inner peace, and practicing virtue as the key to a good life.

Despite the lack of detailed information about the School of the Sextii, its association with Stoicism suggests that it likely shared some of the fundamental principles and ethical teachings of the Stoic philosophy.

It’s important to note that the School of the Sextii was not as well-documented or influential as other philosophical schools of ancient Rome, such as the Stoics, Epicureans, and Peripatetics. As a result, its specific contributions and doctrines remain relatively obscure in the history of philosophy.

School of Salamanca

The School of Salamanca was a group of theologians, jurists, and philosophers who were part of the University of Salamanca in Spain during the 16th and 17th centuries. This intellectual movement is known for its significant contributions to various fields, including economics, ethics, political theory, and international law. The School of Salamanca is considered a precursor to modern economic and legal thought.

Key features and characteristics of the School of Salamanca include:

  1. Scholasticism: The scholars of the School of Salamanca were part of the scholastic tradition, which emphasized the use of reason and logic to explore and understand various aspects of human knowledge, including theology, ethics, and natural law.
  2. Natural Law: The School of Salamanca is renowned for its development and exploration of the concept of natural law. They believed that certain ethical principles and moral norms were universal and derived from human nature and reason, rather than being based solely on divine revelation.
  3. Just Price Theory: The scholars of the School of Salamanca developed theories on economic ethics and just price. They debated the principles of fair exchange and sought to understand the factors that should determine the fair price of goods and services in economic transactions.
  4. Economic Thought: The School of Salamanca contributed to early economic thought, discussing concepts such as the value of money, the role of labor in the economy, and the effects of supply and demand on prices.
  5. International Law: The school also made significant contributions to the development of international law. They explored the concept of a “just war” and discussed the rights of indigenous peoples and the treatment of foreigners in times of conflict.
  6. Influence on the Americas: The ideas of the School of Salamanca had a profound impact on Spanish colonial policy in the Americas. They debated and advocated for the rights and dignity of indigenous populations, arguing against their exploitation and mistreatment.

Notable figures associated with the School of Salamanca include Francisco de Vitoria, Domingo de Soto, and Francisco Suárez. Their works laid the groundwork for modern theories in economics, ethics, and international law.

While the School of Salamanca’s prominence waned over time, its contributions to various fields of knowledge have been recognized and appreciated by scholars and historians. It remains an essential part of the intellectual history of Spain and continues to influence discussions on ethics, economics, and human rights.

School of Names

The School of Names, also known as the Logicians’ School or the School of Disputation, was a philosophical school that emerged during the Warring States period in ancient China (around 475–221 BCE). The School of Names was one of the many intellectual traditions of the time and contributed to the development of Chinese philosophy.

Key features and characteristics of the School of Names include:

  1. Focus on Language and Logic: The School of Names was primarily concerned with the study of language and the nature of names and concepts. Scholars of this school explored the relationships between words, concepts, and reality, seeking to clarify the meaning and use of terms.
  2. Disputation and Debate: The scholars of the School of Names were skilled in argumentation, disputation, and logical reasoning. They engaged in debates to test the validity of their theories and to challenge the positions of their opponents.
  3. Conceptual Analysis: The school emphasized the importance of precise definitions and distinctions in philosophical and logical discussions. Scholars analyzed the logical structures of propositions and concepts to reveal their underlying meanings and implications.
  4. Influence on Mohism: The School of Names had a significant impact on the Mohist school, founded by the philosopher Mozi (Mo Tzu). The Mohists adopted and developed some of the logical and linguistic ideas from the School of Names.
  5. Later Influence: The ideas and methods of the School of Names continued to influence later Chinese philosophical traditions, including Neo-Confucianism during the Song Dynasty (960–1279 CE).

One of the prominent figures associated with the School of Names was Gongsun Long (Kung-sun Lung), who is known for his paradoxes and logical puzzles. Another important thinker was Hui Shi, who also made significant contributions to the study of language and logic.

While the School of Names was influential during its time, it eventually lost prominence as other philosophical schools, such as Confucianism and Daoism, gained prominence in the later periods of Chinese history. Despite its eventual decline, the ideas and inquiries of the School of Names contributed to the rich tapestry of Chinese intellectual history and continue to be of interest to scholars of Chinese philosophy and linguistics.

Scholasticism

Scholasticism was a medieval philosophical and theological system that emerged in Europe during the Middle Ages, particularly in the 12th and 13th centuries. It is often associated with the intellectual and academic culture of medieval universities and played a significant role in the development of Western thought.

Key features and characteristics of scholasticism include:

  1. Integration of Faith and Reason: Scholasticism sought to reconcile Christian theology with classical philosophy, particularly the works of ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle. It aimed to demonstrate the compatibility of faith and reason and show that reason could lead to a deeper understanding of religious truths.
  2. Use of Dialectic: Scholastic philosophers employed dialectical reasoning, a method of argumentation that involved posing questions, offering objections, and providing counterarguments to arrive at clearer and more coherent conclusions.
  3. Emphasis on Logic and Argumentation: Scholasticism emphasized the study of formal logic as a tool for analyzing and clarifying complex theological and philosophical issues. The scholastic method involved posing questions, providing arguments, and engaging in rigorous debates.
  4. Distinction between Faith and Reason: Scholastic thinkers recognized the distinction between the domains of faith and reason. They argued that some truths, especially those related to religious matters, could be known only through divine revelation, while others could be arrived at through rational inquiry.
  5. Use of Quaestiones Disputatae: Scholastic scholars composed “quaestiones disputatae,” which were structured debates or treatises on specific topics. These works often presented different arguments and counterarguments to reach a well-reasoned conclusion.
  6. Scholasticism and University Education: Scholasticism flourished in the context of medieval universities, where scholars engaged in teaching, studying, and debating philosophical and theological questions. Notable universities where scholasticism thrived include the University of Paris and the University of Oxford.
  7. Thomism and Scotism: Two influential philosophical schools within scholasticism were Thomism, founded by Thomas Aquinas, and Scotism, founded by John Duns Scotus. Each school had its unique approach to reconciling faith and reason and interpreting philosophical and theological issues.

Scholasticism’s prominence gradually declined in the later medieval period, giving way to new philosophical and intellectual movements. The Renaissance and the rise of humanism shifted the focus from strictly theological matters to a broader interest in human knowledge, literature, and art.

Despite its eventual decline, scholasticism left a lasting impact on Western thought. It laid the groundwork for the development of modern philosophy and provided a foundation for later debates in epistemology, metaphysics, and ethics. Some elements of scholastic reasoning and method continue to be studied and appreciated by contemporary scholars and philosophers.

Sautrantika

Sautrantika is one of the early schools of Buddhist philosophy that emerged during the early centuries of the Common Era. It is considered a sub-school of the Sarvastivada tradition, which was one of the main Buddhist schools in ancient India. The name “Sautrantika” is derived from the Sanskrit word “sutras,” referring to the discourses of the Buddha, indicating their reliance on Buddhist scriptures for doctrinal explanations.

Key features and characteristics of Sautrantika include:

  1. Interpretation of Buddhist Scriptures: Sautrantika Buddhists considered the Buddha’s discourses (sutras) to be the most authoritative source of Buddhist teachings. They focused on interpreting and analyzing the teachings found in the sutras, especially those related to Buddhist psychology and ethics.
  2. Dependent Origination: Like other Buddhist schools, Sautrantika upheld the doctrine of dependent origination (pratityasamutpada), which explains the interconnectedness and dependent nature of all phenomena. This principle was central to their understanding of impermanence and the nature of suffering.
  3. Concept of Elements: Sautrantika scholars developed the concept of “dharmas” or “elements.” They believed that the ultimate reality consists of discrete and momentary elements (dharmas) that arise and pass away. These elements are considered the basic constituents of existence.
  4. Momentariness: Sautrantika accepted the doctrine of momentariness (kshanika-vada), which suggests that all phenomena, including mental states and physical objects, arise and cease in each moment. This view contrasts with the belief in substantial enduring entities.
  5. Perception and Inference: Sautrantika philosophers classified valid sources of knowledge into two categories: direct perception (pratyaksha) and inference (anumana). They emphasized the importance of critical analysis and reasoning to understand the nature of reality.
  6. Rejection of Abhidharma: Unlike some other schools, Sautrantika Buddhists did not fully accept the Abhidharma texts, which offered detailed philosophical and doctrinal analyses of Buddhist teachings. Instead, they preferred to rely directly on the Buddha’s discourses.
  7. Decline and Disappearance: Sautrantika was a significant Buddhist school during its early development, but it eventually declined and disappeared as an independent school. Many of its ideas and doctrines, however, continued to influence later developments in Buddhist thought.

Sautrantika represents one of the diverse philosophical traditions that emerged within Buddhism as scholars engaged in interpreting and clarifying the Buddha’s teachings. Its perspectives on elements, momentariness, and the reliance on Buddhist sutras for doctrinal understanding contributed to the richness of Buddhist philosophical thought during its time.